Glonti K., Boutron I., Moher D., Hren D. (2019). .. . After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. Peer Review for Manuscript and grant Submissions: Relevance for Research in Clinical Neuropsychology, The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles for Scientific Journals, The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research, InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695, The Scientific Journal: Authorship and the Politics of Knowledge in the Nineteenth century, data.table: Extension of `data.Frame`. While there are similarities between the different ways of using peer review, peer review for manuscript evaluation is specific in the way it is embedded within the organization of scholarly journals (Hirschauer 2004). 2017-07-13 11:21. Consensus decision-making or consensus process (often abbreviated to consensus) are group decision-making processes in which participants develop and decide on proposals with the aim, or requirement, of acceptance by all. Plotkin (2009) in laying out the basis of the editorial management system used in our case patented a process for computer implemented manuscript review and described a prototypical journal peer review process. Centrality is a relative measure, putting different nodes into an ordered relation. UNESCO. Research suggests that editorial management systems as digital infrastructures are adapted to the local needs at scholarly journals and reflect main realms of activities. The editors consider reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Christin (2020) coined the term algorithmic refraction aiming at bypassing algorithmic opacity to address drawing conclusions under the circumstances of incomplete information. These values and criteria can, for instance, be captured by studying aims and means of the patent (Plotkin, 2009) which serves as the technological basis for the editorial management system from our investigation. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. [CDATA[// >